This page has moved to our new address, www.thesartorialist.com. If you're not redirected within a few seconds, please click below. If you still have issues, please clear your cache and try again.

On the Street.... Madison Ave., New York

 
 
 
 
 















Rss Feed

Links

Assignment Photography and Syndication

Gallerist

Categories

This entire site ⓒ 2005-2011 The Sartorialist. All of the photographs herein, unless otherwise noted, are copyrighted by the photographer. No part of this site, or any of the content contained herein, may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without express permission of the copyright holder(s).



 

Monday, June 12, 2006

On the Street.... Madison Ave., New York

Tiny suit as designed by Dolce & Gabbana

Comments on "On the Street.... Madison Ave., New York"

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (6:09 PM) : 

The Thom Browne aesthetic begins its assimilation into the mainstream.....

 

Blogger priscilla said ... (6:35 PM) : 

Oh that's sharp. I love the short slim pant, and no socks...edgy prep, early 1960s.

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (6:40 PM) : 

Very 60's Ray Charles.
Cool!

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (7:01 PM) : 

the retro happened 7 years ago. zegna and isaia re-introduced this style with their spring and summer collections.

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (7:09 PM) : 

Yeah agree argos...love the look, but just don't get the trouser length...just an inch or two longer would be perfect imo

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (7:18 PM) : 

As a collector of vintage suits/ties I knew the style would eventually evolve back into the narrow/short look. I mean...there's no other direction it can go. Thom Browne was just at the right place at the right time.

 

Blogger Anastasia said ... (9:05 PM) : 

waist up he looks FAB - love the hair and glasses too
but I just dont like the pants - it just looks weird and like he is trying too hard.

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (10:11 PM) : 

sharp looking and mysterious! he is hot!

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (10:18 PM) : 

Yeah, I agree with Argos. While the look is sharp, I just don't see this pant length lasting too long.

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (10:32 PM) : 

Perfect. (love the pocket square)

- Eminence Grise

 

Blogger Natalie said ... (11:07 PM) : 

I just can't go for the pants. They look like they were shrunk in the dryer.

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (1:00 AM) : 

The lenght is fine, but it just needs to be slimmer at the bottom end. Now it just seems like he's wearing short pants.

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (2:29 AM) : 

Keep an eye out for the return of the Edwardian era suit-stylings of 50's Britain - it'll happen...

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (3:18 AM) : 

Is there any particular reason why the pants are really short but the sleeve length is "normal"?

 

Blogger Claudio Moro said ... (4:02 AM) : 

Is this really a Dolce&Gabbana suit? The length of the trousers is very unusual for the DG-style, more Thom Browne's look.

Great shoes.

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (6:15 AM) : 

That suit is way too tight and you can easily that this is just a new trend that will not last very long. Besides that, I think that Dolce & Gabbana isn't as innovative as they used to be some years ago...

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (8:40 AM) : 

not a big fan of this look ... the pippi-longstocking pants length doesn't do it for me

 

Blogger Fnarf said ... (10:12 AM) : 

Maybe the pants are a tad too short but it's more interesting that way. What's wrong is, they don't appear to be cuffed. They should be cuffed, and a bit less flared. Overall this is a rockin' look. More Rude Boy than Ray Charles, I would say; all he needs is a stingy-brim hat.

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (2:16 PM) : 

He reminds me more of Desmond Dekkar (rip) than Ray Charles, as Dekkar wore his trousers high and short bumfreezer jackets. This guy looks good, but I'd rather see an interesting sock with the ensemble.

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (4:03 PM) : 

this a style that is too "cute" and will not get enough attention

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (5:43 PM) : 

I don't like the look in general, but I'm sure it works for some people. What I really don't like about these pants are the 3" cuff and they are just a bit too short. The "slim" look doesn't work for me because, I'm not the most slim of guys =)

 

Anonymous pietman said ... (6:19 AM) : 

this is what I call SHARP.

 

post a comment
Newer Posts Older Posts
Best Web Hosting